Cooperative Learning

Teachers can encourage students to relate to each other as they learn in three fundamental ways: competition, or working hard to be the best; individualization, or working hard alone to achieve one’s own goals; and cooperation, or working hard together to combine ideas and provide mutual support. Most teachers and parents have had direct experience with competition and individualization.

Most of us have had benign individualized experiences, in which we did our own work, got our own grades, and didn’t much care or notice what the girl next to us was doing. When we had any experience of cooperative learning, it was likely to be outside the classroom, on a yearbook committee or a sports team, or with a scout troop or youth group associated with a church, temple, or mosque. What made these cooperative experiences memorable was probably pride in a product or a winning season. And we are likely to remember the people who were on our “team,” how each helped us and we helped them. We might even recall exceeding our personal best in their company and how, in spite of the pressures of adolescence, we became friends with people who weren’t exactly like us. These are the benefits of cooperative learning.

There’s one more compelling reason to teach and support students to learn cooperatively. It works. Cooperative learning, studied over 90 years, results in more productivity and higher achievement than either competitive or individual learning.

In “An Overview of Cooperative Learning”, Roger T. and David W. Johnson cite five essential elements of cooperative learning.

  1. Students need to understand that it is their group effort that will be judged, not their individual efforts. The technical term for this is positive interdependence, and the teacher needs to articulate the organizing goals of the lesson as group goals. A second facet of positive interdependence is that each group member has an essential and unique contribution to make to the group project. Sometimes, teachers can structure tasks so that this is concretely true, as well, especially when students are learning how to interact cooperatively. For example, each student may be given only one clue to a puzzle the solution to which requires all pieces.
  2. When students are being evaluated as a group, they begin to help each other in many ways. They help and support each other, share ideas, give worthwhile feedback, and listen to other ways of doing things. These helpful and beneficial interactions follow soon after the group starts to realize and use its own resources wisely.
  3. Although the group is assessed on their collective work, it is equally important to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their contributions. There are many techniques teachers can use to ensure accountability, including giving individual tests, observing and recording the frequency of each group member’s contribution, and having students teach each other.
  4. Students learn how to get along. They acquire and deepen their social skills as cooperative learning continues. Their group work improves as their social skills sharpen, for they communicate more clearly and solve their conflicts more efficiently. Teachers can provide explicit help in this area, too.
  5. Finally, students need time to talk about how well the group worked together, aside and apart from the time spent on the learning task. Small-group processing helps hone and make conscious the process of working together.

Practical Tips for the Beginner

At first glance, it may appear that cooperative learning is better suited to social studies and science projects than it is to math. In fact, cooperative learning works extremely well for mathematics. It reduces anxiety, creates a friendly and supportive atmosphere, and vastly increases how much children learn, remember, and use from their math studies in school.

Here are some concrete tips. If your students have never worked together cooperatively, remember that this is a learned skill. Start small, do your own reading on the subject, and make sure you leave time at the end of every group project to discuss what made it work well or not.

If you inherit or are running a class where children sit in rows, minding their own business (at least most of the time!), and are individually accountable, you might begin by having students share ideas in pairs. But remember, you may have to discuss how to move desks quietly and efficiently without spilling things, you may have to describe the strength of voice that works when all the pairs are talking at once, and you may have to review how to take turns. Learning to work cooperatively is a skill a group can certainly learn, but it is respectful and effective to treat it as a serious component of the curriculum in its own right, especially at the beginning of the year. Bit by bit, you can increase the size of the group, stopping at four, probably, and you can increase the responsibilities of the group and what you expect from them.

Among the materials to help you structure a cooperative learning process, the EQUALS program in California has published a collection of cooperative lessons in which each group member receives a clue. Only when each clue is shared can the problem be solved. This collection, called Get It Together, includes mathematics activities that range from fourth grade to high school levels in difficulty and runs across the various strands of mathematics, including the use of manipulatives. These activities give concrete support to the principle that each group member has a unique and essential contribution to make.

Another technique to help students learn how to learn cooperatively is that of role assignment. You will find a number of role configurations as you read various sources about cooperative learning, but here’s one possible assignment: reader, recorder, checker of understanding, and encourager of participation. You can observe and give feedback as to whether students are fulfilling these roles. Your feedback can also be offered during processing time at the conclusion of each cooperative lesson.

One technique for making sure that no one falls “through the cracks” is to state clearly that, at the conclusion of the project, one person from the group will report on their learning, progress, or outcomes. This person, though, will be chosen randomly. It’s possible to number students and use a spinner to decide who will give the group’s report (and this may promote an investigation into whether the spinner is, indeed, fair!)

Conclusion

Cooperative learning achieves so many worthwhile goals that it’s beneficial and satisfying to take the time to learn and teach it to a group of students. Not only do children learn the material more effectively, they learn about each other and themselves in ways that extend far beyond the classroom, into the lunchroom, the playground, and the community. It changes the way children interact in a fundamental way.

About the Author

Christina Wright, Ph.D., is a math consultant living in Seattle, Washington. She is an adjunct faculty member at Pacific Oaks College Northwest and a frequent facilitator for the online-line Bank Street Forum.